Like most information groups, people on our teams require a wide range of PDF tools. If I’m going to spend that amount on a software utility, I’m going to want to make sure we need it. That’s a lot of reference hours, or part of a database, or professional development for staff. Add to that the premium they charge for working on the format they developed but that is now an open file format, and using Adobe makes little sense for a law library that has to keep an eye on its bottom line.Īlso, $2000 is a lot of money each year to spend on a utility. I have a pretty poor opinion of Adobe and its subscriptions, in light of their inability to protect client information. When I was quoted $2,000 for our team’s annual Adobe license, I knew it was time to look at alternatives. Where we once bought a license and owned software, PDF tools are increasingly provided by subscription. The tools for working with PDFs have changed just as law library collections have. It’s over-used by people who prioritize format over usability on the web, but it’s a necessity for law libraries. The PDF is pervasive in legal information.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |